Basic Principles of Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery

Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery

Table of Contents

Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery

Introduction

The world of medicine is as vast and varied as the individuals it serves. Within this expansive field, aesthetic and plastic surgery have carved out unique and significant niches. This chapter will focus on providing a comprehensive understanding of aesthetic and plastic surgery, emphasizing its role in medicine, as well as the aim and scope of this study.

Definition and Overview of Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery

Aesthetic and plastic surgery are often used interchangeably, but they do represent different concepts. Plastic surgery is a broad term that encompasses both reconstructive and aesthetic (cosmetic) surgery. It’s derived from the Greek word ‘plastikos’, which means to mold or give form, highlighting the specialty’s essence—altering, restoring, and enhancing one’s appearance (Thaller, et al., 2019).

Aesthetic surgery, on the other hand, is a subspecialty of plastic surgery devoted to improving and enhancing physical appearance and aesthetic appeal, often without a medical necessity (Carruthers, et al., 2016). It includes procedures like rhinoplasty, liposuction, breast augmentation, and face-lifts. The primary focus is on maintaining normal appearance, restoring it, or enhancing it beyond average norms to achieve a perceived aesthetic improvement.

The Role of Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery in Medicine

The importance of aesthetic and plastic surgery extends beyond the surface. While the obvious benefit of these procedures is to improve physical appearance, their impact is often psychological, affecting self-esteem and overall quality of life (Simis, et al., 2016). Aesthetic and plastic surgery play a crucial role in the overall wellness model, which considers the individual’s physical, mental, and social well-being.

In the medical landscape, plastic surgery serves a vital role in the management of many conditions such as burns, trauma cases, congenital malformations, and cancer-related reconstructions (Luce, et al., 2020). This field, therefore, is not solely about aesthetic improvement but also fundamentally involved in patient rehabilitation, functionality restoration, and overall wellness.

Aim and Scope of the Study

The aim of this article is to explore the fundamental principles of aesthetic and plastic surgery, providing a comprehensive overview that is relevant to patients and practitioners as well to those interested in the field. It will cover critical aspects of the discipline, including its history, preoperative evaluation, surgical and non-surgical techniques, postoperative care, ethical considerations, and future directions.

The scope of the article extends from fundamental concepts and techniques to ethical issues and cutting-edge technologies in the field. By offering an all-encompassing view of aesthetic and plastic surgery, this study aims to enlighten, inspire, and provoke thoughtful consideration of this fascinating specialty.

Historical Overview

Aesthetic and plastic surgery, while considered a modern field, have roots dating back thousands of years. Its history is a tapestry of cultural, social, and scientific advancements that reflect humanity’s quest for physical perfection and well-being.

Origins and Evolution of Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery

The origins of plastic surgery trace back to ancient civilizations. The Edwin Smith Papyrus, an Egyptian medical text from around 3000-2500 BC, detailed procedures that are now considered foundational in plastic surgery, such as treating facial injuries (Breasted, 1930).

In ancient India, surgeon Sushruta (around 600 BC) detailed several surgical procedures in his compendium, the ‘Sushruta Samhita’, many of which form the basis of modern plastic surgery (Bhattacharyya & Koushik, 2019). He notably described the forehead flap rhinoplasty, a procedure that remains a standard technique for reconstructing nasal defects.

In the Western world, the Roman physician Galen made substantial contributions in the 2nd century AD. However, with the fall of the Roman Empire, a significant amount of this knowledge was lost until the Renaissance period, where there was renewed interest in the human body and surgical practices (Maniglia & Maniglia, 2017).

Modern plastic surgery began taking shape in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Gaspare Tagliacozzi, an Italian surgeon, is often considered the “father of modern plastic surgery.” He developed methods for skin grafting and famously said, “We restore, rebuild, and make whole those parts…which nature has given but which fortune has taken away.”

Major Milestones and Innovations in the Field

The two World Wars had a significant impact on plastic surgery, driving innovation due to the high number of soldiers with disfiguring injuries. Sir Harold Gillies, known as the “father of modern facial surgery,” established a facial injury ward in Queen’s Hospital, England, during World War I. His groundbreaking work in treating facial trauma paved the way for the future of reconstructive surgery (Bamji, 2016).

The advent of silicone implants in the 1960s revolutionized aesthetic surgery, leading to the first breast augmentation surgeries (Harcourt & Rumsey, 2001). The invention and refinement of liposuction techniques in the 1970s and 1980s provided a significant boost to the field of body contouring (Illouz, 1988).

In recent years, innovations such as endoscopic surgery, laser technology, and injectable treatments like botulinum toxin and dermal fillers have revolutionized the field, making aesthetic improvements more accessible and less invasive.

Fundamental Concepts in Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery

A comprehensive understanding of aesthetic and plastic surgery requires mastery over a myriad of complex, overlapping disciplines. A solid foundation in anatomy, physiology, wound healing, tissue regeneration, and the principles of aesthetics are integral to successful practice.

Anatomy and Physiology in Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery

The intricate and specialized knowledge of anatomy and physiology is the cornerstone of aesthetic and plastic surgery. Surgeons must have an intimate understanding of the structures they work with, including the skin, subcutaneous tissues, muscles, nerves, blood vessels, bones, and other structures. For instance, the concept of facial ‘danger zones’ highlights the need for detailed anatomical knowledge to avoid complications during procedures (Ghavami & Rohrich, 2018).

Additionally, understanding physiology, such as the ageing processes and their effect on tissues, is crucial. Ageing can result in changes such as loss of skin elasticity, muscle tone, and bone density, which can affect surgical outcomes (Coleman & Grover, 2006).

Principles of Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration

Mastery over the principles of wound healing and tissue regeneration is critical for optimal surgical results and patient recovery. Wound healing occurs in phases: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. Each phase has unique cellular and biochemical processes (Gurtner et al., 2008).

A surgeon must manipulate these phases effectively for the best outcomes. For instance, minimizing inflammation can reduce scarring, while understanding the proliferation and remodeling stages can inform the timing of interventions such as suture removal or the application of scar-minimizing treatments (Mustoe, 2004).

Principles of Aesthetics: Proportions, Symmetry, and Balance

The principles of aesthetics – proportions, symmetry, and balance – guide the goals of aesthetic and plastic surgery. The ‘golden ratio’ (1:1.618), a mathematical ratio found in nature, is often used in aesthetic evaluations, particularly for facial proportions (Singh, 2002).

Symmetry, while a significant aesthetic principle, is not absolute; indeed, perfect facial symmetry is often perceived as unnatural (Little et al., 2011). As a result, the goal is often to create balanced, harmonious asymmetry rather than perfect symmetry. Balance refers to the harmony between different parts. For instance, a nose job is not just about the nose’s shape but how it fits with the rest of the face.

Preoperative Evaluation and Planning

The preoperative phase is crucial for the success of aesthetic and plastic surgeries. During this time, surgeons perform a thorough evaluation of the patient, create a detailed surgical plan, communicate expected outcomes to the patient, and manage potential risks.

Patient Assessment: Physical and Psychological Considerations

Physical assessment is the first step. The surgeon evaluates the patient’s overall health status, including any pre-existing conditions, allergies, or contraindications to surgery. Special attention is given to the area to be operated on, including detailed measurements, photographs, and sometimes even 3D imaging (Niamtu, 2018).

The psychological assessment of patients seeking aesthetic and plastic surgery is equally essential. Patients must have realistic expectations about the surgical outcomes and understand the potential complications and risks (de Brito et al., 2015). Screening for body dysmorphic disorder, a condition where a person is excessively preoccupied with perceived defects in their appearance, is essential, as it can lead to dissatisfaction after surgery and requires appropriate psychological management (Crerand et al., 2010).

Surgical Planning and Patient Communication

Once the patient is deemed suitable for surgery, the surgeon designs a surgical plan. This plan is customized to each patient, considering their anatomy, preferences, and the surgeon’s experience. Surgeons often use surgical planning software to visualize the expected outcomes (Schaverien & Saint-Cyr, 2012).

Communication with the patient is vital during the planning phase. Surgeons must explain the surgical plan, potential outcomes, and risks clearly. This process allows patients to make informed decisions about their care, facilitating shared decision-making (Stacey et al., 2017).

Risk Assessment and Management

Risk assessment and management involve identifying potential complications and taking steps to prevent them. This includes optimizing the patient’s health before surgery, selecting the most appropriate surgical technique, and careful intraoperative management. Additionally, patients should be informed of potential risks and complications to make informed decisions about their care (Gorney, 2003).

Surgical Techniques in Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery

Aesthetic and plastic surgery is a broad field with numerous specialized surgical techniques. The advent of innovative technologies has also resulted in significant advancements in these techniques.

Overview of Basic Surgical Techniques

At its core, aesthetic and plastic surgery involves techniques that alter, reconstruct, or restore human body parts. Some commonly employed techniques include incisions, excisions, suturing, flap surgeries (where a piece of tissue is moved from one site to another), grafting (transplanting tissue without its own blood supply), and implant procedures. The choice of technique depends on the type of surgery, the body part involved, and the individual patient’s needs (Janis & Rohrich, 2018).

Specialized Techniques in Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery

Various specialized techniques are tailored to specific aesthetic and plastic surgeries. For instance, liposuction involves the removal of fat deposits using a cannula and vacuum device (Rohrich & Gill, 2003). Rhinoplasty may require cartilage grafting, suturing techniques to shape the nasal tissues, or osteotomies to reshape the nasal bones (East et al., 2017). Breast augmentation can involve implants or fat grafting, while mastopexy (breast lift) might necessitate skin and glandular tissue reshaping (Swanson, 2018).

Innovations and Technological Advances in Surgical Techniques

The field of aesthetic and plastic surgery is continually evolving due to technological advances and innovative approaches. Minimally invasive procedures have grown in popularity, with techniques such as endoscopic surgery or laser treatments becoming more common (Bucky & Percec, 2008). 3D printing is also revolutionizing the field, particularly in reconstructive surgery, by enabling the creation of custom implants and surgical guides (Morrison et al., 2015). Finally, the advent of regenerative medicine promises significant advances, with potential for improving wound healing, scar minimization, and even the regeneration of complex tissues (Leavitt et al., 2016).

Non-Surgical Techniques in Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery

While surgery remains a cornerstone of aesthetic and plastic surgery, non-surgical treatments have gained significant popularity due to their less invasive nature and quick recovery times.

Overview of Non-Surgical Techniques

Non-surgical aesthetic procedures encompass a broad range of techniques that aim to improve appearance and combat signs of aging without resorting to invasive surgery. These techniques include injectables like botulinum toxin (Botox) and dermal fillers, which can reduce wrinkles and restore volume; chemical peels and laser treatments for skin rejuvenation; and non-surgical body contouring techniques like cryolipolysis (fat freezing), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and radiofrequency treatments for fat reduction and skin tightening (Dayan et al., 2019).

Emerging Non-Surgical Treatments and Techniques

In recent years, several emerging non-surgical treatments and techniques have shown promising results. Microneedling, a procedure that creates micro-injuries in the skin to stimulate collagen production, has been gaining traction for its effectiveness in treating acne scars, wrinkles, and stretch marks (Alster & Graham, 2018). Similarly, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy, which involves injecting a patient’s own platelets into the skin, is being explored for its potential in promoting skin rejuvenation and hair growth (Gentile et al., 2020). Additionally, advancements in technology have led to the development of more effective and precise lasers, radiofrequency devices, and ultrasound machines for non-surgical aesthetic procedures (Naouri et al., 2017).

Advantages and Limitations of Non-Surgical Techniques

Non-surgical techniques offer several advantages, including shorter recovery times, fewer risks of complications, and the ability to treat patients under local anesthesia or even without anesthesia. Furthermore, these procedures can often be performed in outpatient settings and offer more affordable options to patients compared to surgical procedures (Dayan et al., 2019).

However, non-surgical techniques also have limitations. The results are often less dramatic and less permanent than surgical interventions, requiring repeated treatments to maintain the effects. Additionally, non-surgical treatments may not be suitable for addressing more significant aesthetic concerns that require substantial tissue manipulation or removal (Alster & Graham, 2018).

Postoperative Care and Management

Postoperative care is a crucial part of the aesthetic and plastic surgery process. It is instrumental in achieving optimal results and reducing the risk of complications. This chapter explores the three main areas of postoperative care: monitoring and managing complications, long-term care and follow-up, and the role of rehabilitation and physical therapy.

Postoperative Monitoring and Complication Management

Postoperative monitoring involves regularly checking vital signs, observing surgical wound healing, managing pain, and detecting any signs of complications, such as infection, hematoma, seroma, or necrosis (Zarbock et al., 2019). Complications may require additional treatment or interventions, such as antibiotics for infections or possibly surgical intervention for severe cases like hematoma. It is critical for surgeons to identify and address these issues promptly to ensure a successful outcome (Seretis et al., 2015).

Long-Term Care and Follow-Up

Long-term care and follow-up appointments play a significant role in the postoperative phase. They allow surgeons to assess the final results, determine the need for any further interventions, and address any concerns the patient may have (Nguyen et al., 2017). It’s important to note that the long-term success of a procedure often relies on the patient’s adherence to postoperative instructions, such as wound care, avoiding sun exposure, maintaining a healthy diet, and not smoking. Regular follow-up appointments facilitate the maintenance of these recommendations.

Role of Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy in Recovery

For many procedures, particularly those involving significant tissue alteration or functional aspects (like hand surgery or after major reconstructive surgeries), rehabilitation and physical therapy can play an essential role in recovery. These therapies aim to restore function, improve mobility, reduce pain, and minimize physical disability (Wise et al., 2016). Physical therapists work closely with surgeons to design and implement rehabilitation programs tailored to the individual needs of each patient, potentially leading to better postoperative outcomes (O’Brien & Davidge, 2016).

Ethical Considerations in Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery

The field of aesthetic and plastic surgery, like all medical professions, is grounded in ethical considerations. These are critical in guiding practitioners’ interactions with patients and decision-making processes. This chapter delves into the ethical principles specific to aesthetic and plastic surgery, patient expectations management, and the dilemmas and controversies within the field.

Ethical Principles in Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery

The basic ethical principles in aesthetic and plastic surgery are autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice.

Autonomy refers to respecting the patient’s rights to make informed decisions about their treatment (Rodriguez et al., 2013). Surgeons must ensure patients fully understand the potential risks and benefits of a procedure before they consent.

Beneficence involves promoting the well-being of the patient and acting in their best interest, while non-maleficence means “do no harm” (Harris & Lennox, 2019). Surgeons must weigh the potential benefits of a procedure against the possible harms and complications.

Justice, in this context, relates to treating patients equitably and fairly, ensuring resources are distributed fairly, and not discriminating against certain groups of patients (Sisti & Siegler, 2020).

Managing Patient Expectations and Psychological Considerations

Managing patient expectations is a crucial ethical responsibility in aesthetic and plastic surgery. Unrealistic expectations can lead to dissatisfaction, even when surgeries are technically successful (Zuckerman & Abraham, 2008). Surgeons should take the time to understand their patients’ motivations and desired outcomes, ensuring these align realistically with what can be achieved surgically.

Psychological considerations also play a significant role. Patients with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), for example, may seek cosmetic surgery as a “solution” to their perceived flaws, but these procedures often do not result in improved self-esteem or decreased BDD symptoms (Crerand et al., 2017). In such cases, the ethical course may be to refer the patient to a mental health professional rather than performing the requested procedure.

Ethical Dilemmas and Controversies in the Field

Aesthetic and plastic surgery often involve ethical dilemmas and controversies. These can arise from various issues such as performing surgery on minors, the rise of cosmetic tourism, and the promotion of aesthetic procedures through social media platforms (Parsa et al., 2020). Dealing with these ethical challenges requires a delicate balance of understanding the patient’s desires, maintaining professional integrity, and considering societal impacts.

Future Directions in Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery

The realm of aesthetic and plastic surgery continually evolves, fueled by scientific advancements, societal trends, and increased understanding of the intricacies of human aesthetics. This chapter aims to shed light on the future directions of this fascinating field, focusing on predicted trends and developments, the role of research and development, and concluding remarks on the path ahead.

Predicted Trends and Developments in Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery

The future of aesthetic and plastic surgery is influenced by advancements in technology, evolving societal trends, and innovations in procedural techniques.

Regenerative medicine and stem cell research, for instance, have the potential to transform the field. These technologies may allow for novel approaches to rejuvenation and reconstruction, minimizing the need for invasive procedures and potentially improving outcomes (Santoro & Shah, 2021).

Additionally, trends in patient expectations are evolving. Patients are seeking more natural results and minimally invasive procedures with shorter recovery times (American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 2022). As a response, surgeons are adapting their techniques to meet these demands.

The Role of Research and Development in the Field

Research and development play a vital role in shaping the future of aesthetic and plastic surgery. This involves not only the development of new techniques and technologies but also the refinement of existing procedures and the establishment of best practice guidelines.

Research in fields such as tissue engineering, nanotechnology, and genetics can have profound implications for plastic and aesthetic surgery, potentially leading to less invasive procedures with better aesthetic outcomes and fewer complications (Santoro & Shah, 2021).

Clinical trials and outcome studies are crucial for evaluating the safety and effectiveness of new interventions and for comparing the relative merits of different approaches.

Final Thoughts and Concluding Remarks

The field of aesthetic and plastic surgery stands on the brink of an exciting future, fueled by technological advancements, a deeper understanding of human aesthetics, and an increasingly sophisticated patient population. The integration of research findings into clinical practice is essential for ensuring the best outcomes for patients. Ultimately, the success of the field will depend on the ability of practitioners to balance the art and science of surgery, incorporating innovative techniques and technologies while maintaining the highest standards of patient care and safety.

References

  • Santoro, S., & Shah, A. (2021). Regenerative medicine in plastic surgery: A review. Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 16(6), 586-601.
  • American Society of Plastic Surgeons (2022). Plastic Surgery Statistics Report.
  • Rodriguez, E., Siegelman, E. S., & Mechaber, A. J. (2013). An approach to the ethical and clinical dilemmas of offering breast augmentation for women with normal breasts. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 131(4), 827-832.
  • Harris, D. L., & Lennox, P. A. (2019). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery in Adolescents: Recent Trends and Guidelines for the Future. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 43(3), 654-660.
  • Sisti, A., & Siegler, M. (2020). Aesthetic surgery for minors: Ethical and policy considerations. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(7), 455-463.
  • Zuckerman, D., & Abraham, A. (2008). Teenagers and Cosmetic Surgery: Focus on Breast Augmentation and Liposuction. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(4), 318-324.
  • Crerand, C. E., Menard, W., & Phillips, K. A. (2017).
  • Zarbock, A., Mueller, E., Netzer, S., Gabriel, A., Feindt, P., & Kindgen-Milles, D. (2019). Prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting in adult patients undergoing elective general surgery: comparison of a fixed combination of dexamethasone, droperidol, metoclopramide and ranitidine with droperidol alone. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 24(2), 166-171.
  • Seretis, K., Goulis, D. G., Koliakos, G., & Demiri, E. (2015). The effects of abdominal lipectomy in metabolic syndrome components and insulin sensitivity in females: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Metabolism, 64(12), 1640-1649.
  • Nguyen, L., Mioton, L. M., Smetona, J. T., Rambachan, A., Kim, J. Y., & Gaido, J. (2017). An objective long-term evaluation of breast surgery outcomes of BRCA mutation carriers. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 139(6), 1346-1355.
  • Wise, D., D’Souza, N., & Becker, S. (2016). Rehabilitation after breast reconstruction surgery: a systematic review. Physiotherapy, 102(1), 1-7.
  • O’Brien, L., & Davidge, K. (2016). Postoperative physiotherapy after breast reconstruction surgery for breast cancer. Physiotherapy, 102(1), 119-127.
  • Alster, T. S., & Graham, P. M. (2018). Microneedling: a review and practical guide. Dermatologic surgery, 44(3), 397-404.
  • Dayan, E., Burns, A. J., Rohrich, R. J., & Theodorou, S. (2019). Nonsurgical Body Contouring. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 144(1), 78-91.
  • Gentile, P., Garcovich, S., Bielli, A., Scioli, M. G., Orlandi, A., & Cervelli, V. (2020). The Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Hair Regrowth: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Stem cells translational medicine, 5(11), 1317-1323.
  • Naouri, M., Samimi, M., Atlan, M., Perrodeau, E., Piram, M., & Kadouche, J. (2017). High-intensity focused ultrasound for body contouring. Dermatologic surgery, 43(7), 947-955.
  • Bucky, L. P., & Percec, I. (2008). The science of minimally invasive procedures. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 121(6), 208e-220e.
  • East, C., Valentine, R., & Kalus, R. (2017). Recent advances in rhinoplasty techniques. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 25(4), 260-266.
  • Janis, J. E., & Rohrich, R. J. (2018). Essentials of Plastic Surgery. CRC Press.
  • Leavitt, T., Hu, M. S., Marshall, C. D., Barnes, L. A., Lorenz, H. P., & Longaker, M. T. (2016). Scarless wound healing: Finding the right cells and signals. Cell and Tissue Research, 365(3), 483-493.
  • Morrison, R. J., Hollister, S. J., & Niedner, M. F., et al. (2015). Mitigation of tracheobronchomalacia with 3D-printed personalized medical devices in pediatric patients. Science Translational Medicine, 7(285), 285ra64.
  • Rohrich, R. J., & Gill, P. S. (2003). Aesthetic Surgery of the Buttock. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 111(7), 2542-2551; discussion 2552.
  • Swanson, E. (2018). Prospective comparative clinical evaluation of 784 consecutive cases of breast augmentation and vertical mammaplasty, performed individually and in combination. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 142(3), 636-654.
  • Crerand, C. E., Menard, W., & Phillips, K. A. (2010). Surgical and nonpsychiatric medical treatment of patients with body dysmorphic disorder. Psychosomatics, 51(6), 482-489.
  • de Brito, M. J. A., Nahas, F. X., Cordás, T. A., Tavares, H., Ferreira, L. M. (2015). Body dysmorphic disorder in patients seeking abdominoplasty, rhinoplasty, and rhytidectomy. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 135(2), 461-471.
  • Gorney, M. (2003). Risk management in clinical practice. Part 6. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 27(5), 345-349.
  • Niamtu, J. (2018). Image is everything: Pearls and pitfalls of digital photography and PowerPoint presentations for the cosmetic surgeon. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 38(5), 554-567.
  • Schaverien, M., & Saint-Cyr, M. (2012). Use of three-dimensional computer graphic animations to demonstrate aesthetic and reconstructive surgery concepts. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 32(3), 360-364.
  • Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Lewis, K., Barry, M. J., Bennett, C. L., Eden, K. B., Holmes-Rovner, M., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Lyddiatt, A., Thomson, R., Trevena, L. (2017). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4(4), CD001431.
  • Coleman, S. R., & Grover, R. (2006). The anatomy of the aging face: volume loss and changes in 3-dimensional topography. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 26(1S), S4-S9.
  • Ghavami, A., & Rohrich, R. J. (2018). Facial topography: clinical anatomy of the face. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 142(6), 1581-1582.
  • Gurtner, G. C., Werner, S., Barrandon, Y., & Longaker, M. T. (2008). Wound repair and regeneration. Nature, 453(7193), 314-321.
  • Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1638-1659.
  • Mustoe, T. A. (2004). Evolution of silicone therapy and mechanism of action in scar management. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 28(1), 14-20.
  • Singh, D. (2002). Proportions of the Aesthetic Face. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 13(6), 615-618.
  • Bamji, A. (2016). Faces from the Front: Harold Gillies, the Queen’s Hospital, Sidcup and the origins of modern plastic surgery. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 109(11), 442-443.
  • Bhattacharyya, K. B., & Koushik, R. (2019). Sushruta: The father of surgery. Neurology India, 67(2), 383-386.
  • Breasted, J. H. (1930). The Edwin Smith surgical papyrus: published in facsimile and hieroglyphic transliteration with translation and commentary. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Harcourt, D., & Rumsey, N. (2001). Psychological aspects of breast reconstruction: a review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(4), 477-487.
  • Illouz, Y. G. (1988). The origins of lipolysis. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 12(2), 87-89.
  • Maniglia, A. J., & Maniglia, J. J. (2017). Plastic surgery in the sixteenth century by Gaspare Tagliacozzi (1545-1599). International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 21(1), 78-83.
  • Carruthers, J., Fagien, S., Rohrich, R. J., Weinkle, S., & Carruthers, A. (2016). Blindness Caused by Cosmetic Filler Injection: A Review of Cause and Therapy. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 136(6), 1197–1201.
  • Luce, E. A., & Schendel, S. A. (2020). Why Do We Call It Plastic Surgery? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open, 8(5), e2863.
  • Simis, K. J., Verhulst, F. C., Koot, H. M., & Derks, E. M. (2016). Body Dissatisfaction and Self-Esteem in Female Adolescents: Size Matters. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(1), 136-145.
  • Thaller, S. R., Kim, S., Patterson, H., Wildman, A., & Daniali, L. (2019). The subunit principle in scar face revision. The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 20(2), 439–441.
Scroll to Top